ID | Recommendation |
---|---|
Foster the use of open access software in the context of digital humanities. |
|
Strengthen the articulation between research infrastructures, federating the access to services and resources to the community. |
|
Define and execute a joint strategy for training, directed to different targets, as a way of securing the social sustainability of a research infrastructure.
Based on a survey conducted under the DESIR project, the early-career researchers group appears as the prioritary target (where the lowest rates of digital humanities practices are found). |
|
Promote linguistic diversity, endowing DARIAH"s country members with linguistic technologies which are now demanded by a "knowledge society". |
|
Provide unified access to learning resources produced by scholars and institutions affiliated with DARIAH so that users can find what they need more easily. |
|
Support potential DARIAH partners in identifying new communities and core groups by publishing and disseminating research opportunities. |
|
Implement a contact system which is clearer, more direct and more efficient, and which improves the links between DARIAH and its National Coordinators. |
|
Support the creation of normatives and best practices regarding the preservation, management and curation of digital infrastructures" data. |
|
Place DARIAH as an active supporter of open science at the European level, supporting its members in the implementation of national strategies and policies. |
|
Account travel expenses of National Coordinators attending international meetings as eligible for funding purposes. |
|
Make DARIAH"s organizational model of working groups more flexible and less vertical. |
|
Create mechanisms for support, follow up and engagement among DARIAH users and stakeholders. |
|
Deepen the interaction among scientific and cultural institutions. |
|
Establish clear guidelines/procedures about the organizational model of DARIAH. |
|
Demonstrate the social and economic value of DARIAH to the industry and the greater public. |
|
Reinforce contents that can help using the infrastructure and provide them through the different stakeholders / interfaces already existing in the universities (e.g. libraries, research support units). |
|
Develop a digital framework to support policies and practices for the citizen science ecosystem. |
|
Labelling and branding all the national resources, activities and services as DARIAH. |
|
Adapting DARIAH orientations, at the european level, to each national context. |
|
Promote a wider utilization of Massive Open Online Courses" platforms, in order to increase DARIAH"s visibility and strengthen its community in the intra and extra-european territories. |
|
Disseminate DARIAH among the documentation services of academic and scientific research institutions. |
|
Identify potential new national cooperating partners. |
|
Implement a common strategy for raising regional funding by promoting DARIAH"s integration inthe Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). |
|
Ensuring that every DARIAH tool and service is available in the common infrastructure, gathering them in a platform such as the Marketplace. |
|
Maintaining and exploiting the potential of open science to increase visibility of DARIAH outputs. |
|
Foster and support specific training for research Infrastructures experts and managers. |
|
Promote the development of strategic joint e-services in digital humanities between DARIAH members. |
|
Support mobility mechanisms and schemes for Research Infrastructure"s staff between DARIAH members and different RIs. |
|
Support enlargement and promote activities that increase awareness of DARIAH advantages promoting regular communication and digest of examples of activities for all DARIAH co-operating partners. |
|
Focus communication more strongly by appealing more to individual users. |
|
Research infrastructures should develope towards granting content accessibility to all its potential users, and have a multilingual scope. |