ID | Recommendation |
---|---|
Foster the use of open access software in the context of digital humanities. |
|
Strengthen the articulation between research infrastructures, federating the access to services and resources to the community. |
|
Having a brief and clear list of benefits and showcases explaining how useful can DARIAH be to the community and what services can DARIAH provide. |
|
Define and execute a joint strategy for training, directed to different targets, as a way of securing the social sustainability of a research infrastructure.
Based on a survey conducted under the DESIR project, the early-career researchers group appears as the prioritary target (where the lowest rates of digital humanities practices are found). |
|
Raise awareness among Higher Education Institutions to the importance of offering formal training programs aimed at developing competences in the digital humanities. |
|
Raise awareness about the importance of supporting social sciences, arts and humanities, among national decision makers. |
|
Promote linguistic diversity, endowing DARIAH"s country members with linguistic technologies which are now demanded by a "knowledge society". |
|
Provide unified access to learning resources produced by scholars and institutions affiliated with DARIAH so that users can find what they need more easily. |
|
Promote DARIAH through its representatives and improve contacts with countries at a higher level. |
|
Support potential DARIAH partners in identifying new communities and core groups by publishing and disseminating research opportunities. |
|
Implement a contact system which is clearer, more direct and more efficient, and which improves the links between DARIAH and its National Coordinators. |
|
Promote an annual work agenda with clear KPIs for the National Coordinators. |
|
Support the creation of normatives and best practices regarding the preservation, management and curation of digital infrastructures" data. |
|
Place DARIAH as an active supporter of open science at the European level, supporting its members in the implementation of national strategies and policies. |
|
Account travel expenses of National Coordinators attending international meetings as eligible for funding purposes. |
|
Creating common spaces that can foster the participation and dialogue between the technological dimension and research in Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities. |
|
Make DARIAH"s organizational model of working groups more flexible and less vertical. |
|
Establish DARIAH as a structure that can support EU fundraising for the development of Digital Humanities" projects. |
|
Advertise best practices in the areas of Intellectual Property Rights and licensing. |
|
Create mechanisms for support, follow up and engagement among DARIAH users and stakeholders. |
|
Strive for political resolutions aiming at longer funding cycles for research infrastructures. |
|
Deepen the interaction among scientific and cultural institutions. |
|
Establish clear guidelines/procedures about the organizational model of DARIAH. |
|
Create indicators to allow an analysis over time and to determine the “trust trajectory” in research infrastructures. |
|
Establish a standard feedback form/questionnaire to be given to all the participants in DARIAH training measures to respond to. |
|
Development of a permanent methodology to monitor, measure and validate users’ opinions and reactions about DARIAH’s services and tools, in order to assess DARIAH users’ trust on the already existing services. |
|
Having a brief and clear definition of DARIAH, so that every National Coordinator and accession countries can explain it in the same way to their communities. |
|
Define a set of clear objectives and goals for DARIAH. |
|
Assimilate best-practices and examples from research infrastructures with a higher level of experience and consolidation. |
|
Build DARIAH as a researcher-driven infrastructure with a strong focus on usability. |
|
Providing a method of approaching each scientific community according to their discipline and specific needs and considering the different audiences. |
|
Provide a "Welcome & Implementation Kit" addressed to the new members. |
|
Demonstrate the social and economic value of DARIAH to the industry and the greater public. |
|
Reinforce contents that can help using the infrastructure and provide them through the different stakeholders / interfaces already existing in the universities (e.g. libraries, research support units). |
|
Increase DARIAH visibility and relevance in the citizen science agenda setting. |
|
Develop a digital framework to support policies and practices for the citizen science ecosystem. |
|
Develop an european advocacy plan for digital citizen science in social sciences, arts and humanities. |
|
Labelling and branding all the national resources, activities and services as DARIAH. |
|
Adapting DARIAH orientations, at the european level, to each national context. |
|
Ensuring that all the national in-kind contributions are useful for DARIAH and labelled as DARIAH at the institutional and national level. |
|
Define a multiannual events representation. Participate in the main national and european/international conferences of each scientific discipline, looking for an opportunity to disseminate DARIAH in those fora. |
|
Promote a wider utilization of Massive Open Online Courses" platforms, in order to increase DARIAH"s visibility and strengthen its community in the intra and extra-european territories. |
|
Develop open peer-review and post-publishing mechanisms in research infrastructures and institutional repositories. |
|
Promote the adoption of scientific evaluation mechanisms that are in tune with open science practices and models, simultaneously complying with institutional, scientific, disciplinary and methodologic diversity. |
|
Disseminate DARIAH among the documentation services of academic and scientific research institutions. |
|
Identify potential new national cooperating partners. |
|
Promote common standards and best practices for documentation and tools/resources and, by this, enable the principal long-term sustainability. |
|
Improve the structure and the contents available at DARIAH"s website, making it easier, clearer and more intuitive to its users. |
|
Implement a clear and comprehensive Business Plan, resulting from a participatory and collaborative process with all stakeholders. |
|
Implement a common strategy for raising regional funding by promoting DARIAH"s integration inthe Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). |
|
Advertise DARIAH as a long-term sustainable infrastructure, as a way of fostering trust among its users. |
|
Ensuring that every DARIAH tool and service is available in the common infrastructure, gathering them in a platform such as the Marketplace. |
|
Maintaining and exploiting the potential of open science to increase visibility of DARIAH outputs. |
|
Foster and support specific training for research Infrastructures experts and managers. |
|
Promote the development of strategic joint e-services in digital humanities between DARIAH members. |
|
Support the establishment of a research data management competency center in DARIAH countries to assist policymaking, standards adoption, tool delivery, background information, awareness raising and community building. |
|
Strengthen DARIAH"s position/representation in european higher education and scientific umbrella organizations. |
|
Support mobility mechanisms and schemes for Research Infrastructure"s staff between DARIAH members and different RIs. |
|
Expand the visibility of DARIAH outside UE borders. |
|
Support enlargement and promote activities that increase awareness of DARIAH advantages promoting regular communication and digest of examples of activities for all DARIAH co-operating partners. |
|
Development of DARIAH’s profile in new and innovative technology areas. |
|
Focus communication more strongly by appealing more to individual users. |
|
Research infrastructures should develope towards granting content accessibility to all its potential users, and have a multilingual scope. |